RegisterRegister   Log inLog in   AlbumAlbum   Home Portal PageHome  

APOLOGY AND RESPECT
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
 

Should we apologise for past demenours????
Yes as it is the way forward.
66%
 66%  [ 14 ]
No i don't think so.
9%
 9%  [ 2 ]
They got what they deserved and its better this way.
14%
 14%  [ 3 ]
I don't care
9%
 9%  [ 2 ]
Total Votes : 21

Author Message
brother
Warnings : 3

Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 8920
Location: London/Cyprus

PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 12:58 pm    Post subject: APOLOGY AND RESPECT Reply with quote

I firmly believe that 'us' cypriots have still to make amends to one another concerning our recent history from 1963 up till today for the inhumane and unacceptable realities we inflicted on each other and to current date still do by refusing to accept and make amends for this dark part of our history.

I would like to see if our members on this forum agree that we should make apologies for the past to help in the healing of the present for an amicable and prosperous future.


Some of the issues we need to own up to (i repeat some of them but feel free to add some more)


Turkish Cypriot being forced to live in ghettos for 11 years

Greek Cypriot being forced to leave their homes

Turkish Cypriot and Greek Cypriot deaths at the hands of EOKA

Turkish Cypriot deaths at the hands of EOKAB

Greek Cypriot deaths at the hands of TMT and Turkish army

Turkish Cypriot and Greek Cypriot in letting the cyprus problem last 32+ years

Turkish Cypriot and Greek Cypriot failure to bring the murderers of its people to justice

And the list just goes on and on, we have much to be ashamed of and need to eat lots of humble pie.

Those truely who feel something for their fellow country men will understand where this is heading as in when you are courageous enough to admit to the wrongs done in your name and make amends for it through a heart felt apology you earn and gain the respect of the people you have wronged and a new leaf is turned in your relationship with them and prejudices of old are no longer an issue in your present and the future becomes positive.

In short nothing to lose but everything to gain imo.


Last edited by brother on Mon Feb 19, 2007 1:21 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
cypezokyli

Ministerial
Ministerial


Joined: 20 Dec 2005
Posts: 2344

PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 5:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i agree and i apologise
Back to top
Bullika
Warnings : 1

Ministerial
Ministerial


Joined: 29 Sep 2005
Posts: 3025
Location: World

PostPosted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 12:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

apologies carry a psychological importance no doubt as they make certain people believe that times have changed for the better. but apologies are not enough, they are just words, they need to be accompanied with action by both sides, and the best place imo to start is in education. if we teach people to view eachother as cypriots and human beings and embrace the notion that cyprus is not greek or turkish but a multi-cultural nation then under multi-culturalism we can live together.
Back to top
Birkibrisli

Deputy
Deputy


Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 1404
Location: Australia

PostPosted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 4:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I too agree and unreservedly apologise.
I just want to add two more items to brothers list:

Apologies to Turkish Cypriots killed or driven away in exile by the TMT;
and Apologies to our country Cyprus and her people the Cypriots, for failing to protect them from the evil designs of the imperialists and colonialists of all persuation...

if we could only accept that we are collectively guilty of terrible crimes perpetrated in our name,that would go a long way in fostering understanding and respect.
Back to top
stavrizatz

Mukhtar/is
Mukhtar/is


Joined: 20 Feb 2006
Posts: 924
Location: Australia / Lefkosia

PostPosted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 4:21 am    Post subject: Acknowledge the past Reply with quote

Hi there,

It's good to acknowledge the past but not really apologise.

Apologise is to say sorry for something that our generation haven't done, so I think many people wouldn't like to apologise. On the other hand acknoledge it is to recognise the trauma that Cypriots (both Turkish and Greek) suffered.

You mentioned EOKA, do you mean EOKA B' because EOKA was formed to fight the Brittish and liberate Cyprus, there was no link between EOKA and deaths of Greek or Turkish Cypriots (maybe some who supported the Brittish), as far as I know. EOKA was not a terrorism organisation as the Brittish called them but purely a liberation struggle. Brittish also called the Australian Native people animals and white people were allowed to shot them as animals, it was not a murder so...

Ok this is as far as I know, the struggle happened 50 years ago so there might be hidden truths that i am not aware of.

Please let me know if you have heared something different (I mean something different but not Turkish propaganda).
Back to top
erolz

Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 11 Aug 2005
Posts: 4195
Location: Kyrenia / Girne

PostPosted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 8:03 am    Post subject: Re: Acknowledge the past Reply with quote

stavrizatz wrote:

You mentioned EOKA, do you mean EOKA B' because EOKA was formed to fight the Brittish and liberate Cyprus, there was no link between EOKA and deaths of Greek or Turkish Cypriots (maybe some who supported the Brittish), as far as I know. EOKA was not a terrorism organisation as the Brittish called them but purely a liberation struggle. Brittish also called the Australian Native people animals and white people were allowed to shot them as animals, it was not a murder so...


EOKA was NOT 'purely' a liberation struggle - its stated aim and goal was ENOSIS and that makes it much more than 'purely' a liberation struggle. EOKA killed Greek Cypriot, Turkish Cypriot and British - some because they opposed ENOSIS (not liberation but enosis) or supported bicommunal respect and some (mainly Greek Cypriot) because they were to 'communist leaning'. If you define a terrorist orgnaisation by how they behave then there is no doubt that EOKA was a terrorist organisation for they sought to use fear terror and intimidation to achieve their political goals. Form me it matters not how just those goals may or may not have been, it matters what they did. Shooting the pregnant wife of a British service man in the back whilst she was out shopping is clearly an act of terror and thus the perpetrators in my book were clearly terrorists.

stavrizatz wrote:

Ok this is as far as I know, the struggle happened 50 years ago so there might be hidden truths that i am not aware of.

Please let me know if you have heared something different (I mean something different but not Turkish propaganda).


The above truths are not hidden - you just have to be prepared and able to see them.
Back to top
depurple
Warnings : 1

Ministerial
Ministerial


Joined: 06 Dec 2005
Posts: 2876
Location: Australia

PostPosted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 10:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stravorasta
What Erolz is say is correct mate and I agree with his views on EOKA & EOKA B:
BUT let me add:
The Poms told Makarios that they will have to delay giving Cyprus Independence for a few more years to protect the Suez Canal and the Middle East But he didn't tell the people this: He and Grivas said lets fight for Independence:
BUT WHO was going to pay Great Britain the millions they spent on the infrastructure: So that is why the UK has the bases and dose NOT PAY ONE CENT:
WE owe them money: Like Australia owes the POMS money: We Aussie will get Independence in 2025 or something like that:
PERSONALLY i want the UK to stay in Australia FOREVER:
We have 200 million Indonesians 100 kilometers
away and the only 2 THINGS that is stopping them attacking Australia ONE DAY is:
1: The Union Jack on our Flag:
2: The Queens picture on our MONEY!
Hail to Britain!
God Save the Queen!
And all that jazz!
Tally Ho PIP PIP Hooray!
Cheers!
PS I forgot why Makarios and Grivas did this!
Makarios for megalomania POWER and Grivas to kill the Communists first and go back to mother Greece!
Politics LOVE IT or LEAVE IT!
Back to top
stavrizatz

Mukhtar/is
Mukhtar/is


Joined: 20 Feb 2006
Posts: 924
Location: Australia / Lefkosia

PostPosted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 2:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Erolz

Quote:
EOKA was NOT 'purely' a liberation struggle - its stated aim and goal was ENOSIS and that makes it much more than 'purely' a liberation struggle

Allow me to disagree with you. Actually Enosis was not really the main goal of EOKA. The goal was the gain the right of the countries according to UN to have self-determination, which at the time self-determination meant Enosis. Even if the goal was Enosis still EOKA was a liberation struggle because also the aim was to liberate Cyprus from the colonial power.

I doubt that people were killed because they opposed Enosis, at least I doubt that this killings occurred officially There is no doubt that "shit happens" in wars and EOKA as an organisation cannot be judged by the actions of individual soldiers. Actually you can call EOKA terrorist as the definition of terrorism is "any action which aims the change of government policy" but was it a real government.

If EOKA was so bad fight communists and so on then why the communist side of my family did not mention anything negative about EOKA.

Quote:
The above truths are not hidden - you just have to be prepared and able to see them


Please show them to me
Thanks
Back to top
depurple
Warnings : 1

Ministerial
Ministerial


Joined: 06 Dec 2005
Posts: 2876
Location: Australia

PostPosted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 2:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

stavrizatz
I am sure you are Eric's mirror image!
"I doubt that people were killed because they opposed Enosis" tell that to my Uncle Adreas wife and 6 children mate!
He was against ENOSIS so they called him a Communist and bang! Tell you the truth he wasn't really nothing But they killed him anyway:
They said they where sorry about it! So you see they did have a heart!

NO Communist I ever knew in Cyprus wanted ENOSIS with GREECE: Never!
They wanted Independence YES!
BUT Britain hired Grivas to do the dirty work and knock OFF the Communist in Cyprus BECAUSE the communists wanted independence and then call in RUSSIA to put a base in Cyprus like in CUBA and this made the British and the US go crazy:
Grivas also did a good job in Greece with the Communists: Ask about him in Kardista! The women are still wearing BLACK!
Read Peter Wright book "Spy Catcher"about Grivas and Churchill:
Also I have said this again and again and will again and again UNTIL you understand what Independence means!
Cyprus OWES money to Britain for the infrastructure that they put into Cyprus:
stavrizatz ANSWER THIS:
Who put the!!!!!!!
Electricity:
telephones:
Postage service:
Ports:
Air Ports:
Dams:
Radio:
TV
ect ect
Who Mate?
Greece? They didn't have this UNTIL the 60s Cyprus had all this in the 20s:
Turkey? Some of Turkey still hasn't got all this today:
It was Britain my Friend and all this had to be paid:
BUT Greece had NO money to pay so they TOLD some misguided fools to fight for it:EOKA: Instead of waiting for it!
All they had to do is wait for a few years longer for Britain to give it to us:
LOOK at Australia we still haven't got it because we cant pay Britain the money yet!
Look at FIJI: They paid Britain what they owed in GOLD and Rambuka went to England and picked up the Constitution and amended it to say that only Fijian with Fijian blood are allowed to rule FIJI:
So you see my good EOKA friend what you and EOKA thought and what is reality are 2 different things in politics:
That is politics and one day even you might be able to sit with big name politicians on an equal par and talk politics and not BULL! OR should I say LOGIA TOU KAFENIOU:
Translated: Coffee shop Crap!
EOKA A: They where tricked and died unnecessarily:
EOKA B: They where misguided gangsters:
ENOSIS: Was a dream for people who thought they where Greeks and NOT Cypriots:
A bit like Northern Ireland!
It a long way to the TOP if you want to ROCK & ROLL in politics:
RIP Bon Scott:
PS Let me add one more thing:
Whilst Britain Ruled Cyprus, TURKEYS dream of INVADING Cyprus would of been only that: A DREAM!
What was the famous EOKA B saying my uncle used to say: Oh Yes!
Better a fess (Turkish HAT) than Communism:
He got his wish!
Back to top
erolz

Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 11 Aug 2005
Posts: 4195
Location: Kyrenia / Girne

PostPosted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 4:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

stavrizatz wrote:
Allow me to disagree with you.


By all means.

stavrizatz wrote:

Actually Enosis was not really the main goal of EOKA.


Actually ENOSIS was the stated goal of EOKA. It was laos the stated personal goal of its leader General Grivas.

stavrizatz wrote:

The goal was the gain the right of the countries according to UN to have self-determination, which at the time self-determination meant Enosis.


You do not gain self determination by handing the sovereignty of your country to an external foreign power and political executive power to a center based in another country over 800km away.Nor do you gain the exercise of your right to self determination by obliterating that right by subsuming it into the will of foreign country. These are the fundamental madnesses of ENOSIS idea.
By 1950 it was totally clear that independence of Cyprus was not only possible but also inevitable eventually even without a resort to violence on the part of the Cypriot people. What was also totally clear at that time was that ENOSIS was not achievable. Yet you try and argue that a group that had ENOSIS as it's stated aim was not actually after ENOSIS (the clearly unachievable) but instead independence (the celarly achievable). If EOKA's aim was just independence then obvious and clearest way to achieve that would have been to struggle for independence - which was achievable and inevitable in any case. That is NOT what EOKA did.

stavrizatz wrote:

Even if the goal was Enosis still EOKA was a liberation struggle because also the aim was to liberate Cyprus from the colonial power.


You do not liberate a country by transferring political ownership and control from one foreign power to another. In any case even if one accepts that the EOKA struggle was a liberation struggle that does not mean that people who committed terrorist acts in it's pursuit are not terrorists. The IRA were involved in a liberation struggle (in thier eyes) - yet when they placed bombs in shopping centers they were still terrorist.

stavrizatz wrote:

I doubt that people were killed because they opposed Enosis, at least I doubt that this killings occurred officially There is no doubt that "shit happens" in wars and EOKA as an organisation cannot be judged by the actions of individual soldiers. Actually you can call EOKA terrorist as the definition of terrorism is "any action which aims the change of government policy" but was it a real government.


Grivas gave orders that certain people that opposed ENOSIS were to be killed and they were killed, for opposing ENOSIS (well actually for opposing Grivas). That is just historical fact. It is also clear that Grivas - a rabid and vicious anti communist prior to his return to Cyprus, continued a similar policy under EOKA.

stavrizatz wrote:

If EOKA was so bad fight communists and so on then why the communist side of my family did not mention anything negative about EOKA.


You will have to ask them that not me.

stavrizatz wrote:

Please show them to me
Thanks


I could show you, but you actually need to do your own investigation and seeking of the truth, for you will not benefit from such truths if I give them to you (you will just dismiss them one way or another). As they say on the x files - the truth is out there. The only question that remains is do you want the truth or do you want to reinforce your current belief systems.

Maybe you start with a google search on 'Turks living Greece Thrace human rights'
Back to top
Kifeas
Warnings : 6

Ministerial
Ministerial


Joined: 26 Aug 2005
Posts: 2733
Location: Location: Pafos-Cyprus, since 1974 ethnic cleansing. Originally, Lapithos, northern occupied Cyprus.

PostPosted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 4:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

erolz wrote:
You do not gain self determination by handing the sovereignty of your country to an external foreign power and political executive power to a center based in another country over 800km away.Nor do you gain the exercise of your right to self determination by obliterating that right by subsuming it into the will of foreign country. These are the fundamental madnesses of ENOSIS idea.


Are these your only arguments against Enosis in the 50’s? If yes, then allow me to call them nonsense!

Cyprus at the time was not a sovereign entity, to have to hand over its sovereignty to another country. The majority of the indigenous inhabitants of the place did not see Greece and its people as an external foreign power, but instead -rightfully or wrongfully, they saw themselves as part of the same people (or nation in its broader sense.) As for the distance, allow me to tell you that the furthermost south east corner of Turkey’s vicinity is situated almost 1,100 kms far away from the capital Ankara. Falkland (or Maldives) islands are situated 12,000 kms away from London, the capital of your other motherland.
Back to top
depurple
Warnings : 1

Ministerial
Ministerial


Joined: 06 Dec 2005
Posts: 2876
Location: Australia

PostPosted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 5:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes all this ENOSIS Crap is great BUT who was going to pay the British for the money they spent on Cyprus infrastructure?
So what SOME Greek Cypriot wanted ENOSIS was NEVER GOING TO HAPPEN and it did not matter who many Communist and Turkish Cypriot and others that the EOKA B had to kill to achieve there ULTIMATE dream:OR should I say Nightmare:
One question for the ENOSIS fanatics:
When have you seen Greek TV showing Cyprus when they say the weather or even mentioning Cyprus:NEVER!
The Greeks don't care:
The ENOSIS Greek Cypriot are more Patriot Greeks THAN the bloody Greeks themselves:
Do you really think that Greece and Turkey give a toss about what happens to Cyprus:
Greece sold Cyprus out many times my friend BUT most EOKA B are too fanatical and one eyed blind to see this FACT!
NOW Turkey is about to sell out the Turkish Cypriot with the EU Wait and SEE!:
As a Cypriot it must be hard for all die hard fanatical ENOSIS Greek Cypriot and TMT Turkish Cypriot who love their mother countries so much they would destroy their OWEN Country Cyprus (And Have) to know sit back and see themselves being sold out by the people they thought loved them?
Like I said before Greece and Turkey don't care about Cyprus:
With one phone call BOTH countries can solve Cyprus in 2 minutes:
You cant tell me if Erogdan rings Talat and tells him to do this and that Talat wont do it?
The same for TPAPA with Greece!
Come on Boys : Wake up! Hallo? Is anyone there?
BUT let me now make you ALL HAPPY LARRY'S:
Hopefully soon ALL of Cyprus will be under the EU and All of Turkey as well and then you can ALL BE ENOSIS with everyone in the EU:
You can say you can ALL BE IN BED TOGETHER AT LAST!
But a word of advice by someone older and wiser!
Keep the Vaseline close by!
CCCCCCCCRRRRRRRIIIIIIKKKKKEEEEYYY!
Back to top
Cyprus rules!

Mukhtar/is
Mukhtar/is


Joined: 11 Jun 2006
Posts: 668

PostPosted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 7:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hey, as far as I can tell, EOKA were fighting for the self determination rights of the Greek Cypriots (Cypriots), which at that time was for Enosis, or union with Greece. I can understand why people wanted Enosis, and I don't think it was for sinister reasons....Although the majority who fought for, helped and supported EOKA, were 'honourable', there was a sinister side to the organization. Unfortunately the leaders tended to be right wing nationalists, who were very against communism. So that small faction, made it not only a fight against colonialism, but also, to a certain extent a fight against 'the communists' (who, I believe disagreed with some of the methods used...). This small 'extremist' faction also killed people they saw as traitors, Greek and Turkish Cypriot alike (people who, they felt were 'working too close with the British'). This is the impression that I've got, but I could be wrong...

Smile
Back to top
erolz

Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 11 Aug 2005
Posts: 4195
Location: Kyrenia / Girne

PostPosted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 8:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kifeas wrote:
erolz wrote:
You do not gain self determination by handing the sovereignty of your country to an external foreign power and political executive power to a center based in another country over 800km away.Nor do you gain the exercise of your right to self determination by obliterating that right by subsuming it into the will of foreign country. These are the fundamental madnesses of ENOSIS idea.


Are these your only arguments against Enosis in the 50’s? If yes, then allow me to call them nonsense!


Call them what you want. The fact remains that the very notion of 'union with another country' as an expression of (cypriot) 'independance' and the desire to subsume the cypriot right to self determination into the self determination of Greeks - as an expression of Cypriot self determination is was and will always be nonsense.

Kifeas wrote:

Cyprus at the time was not a sovereign entity, to have to hand over its sovereignty to another country.


To have achieved ENOSIS would have been to hand Cypriot sovereignty to Greece.

Kifeas wrote:

The majority of the indigenous inhabitants of the place did not see Greece and its people as an external foreign power, but instead -rightfully or wrongfully, they saw themselves as part of the same people (or nation in its broader sense.)


No the majority of the Greek Cypriot community, which were the cultural descendants of the Hellenic cultural invaders of Cyprus that had replaced and destroyed (culturally) the indigenous Cypriot people may not have seen Greece as a foreign power - but Greece is a foreign power none the less. It was then and remains so today. Of course the Turkish Cypriot community , which were the descendants of the ottoman invaders that did not destroy (culturally) the Greek Cypriot people did NOT see Greece as the same people or Cyprus as part of the Greek nation. Of course in your world of human rights and self determination the Turkish Cypriot community could have NO say in such a matter - they just were supposed to agree to hand their country and homeland over to Greece because there were more Greek Cypriot in Cyprus than Turkish Cypriot and have no voice or say in such a fundamental issue.

Kifeas wrote:

As for the distance, allow me to tell you that the furthermost south east corner of Turkey’s vicinity is situated almost 1,100 kms far away from the capital Ankara. Falkland (or Maldives) islands are situated 12,000 kms away from London, the capital of your other motherland.


Let me tell you that I believe it is madness for the UK to claim sovereignty over the Falklands - and principally on the sheer fact of disconnected geography.

ENOSIS was and is a nonsense. To claim ENOSIS was an expression of 'independance' is total nonsense - ENOSIS is was and will remain the antithesis of Cypriot independence. To claim one of the rights of self determination is to destroy ones right to self determination is also a nonsense. ENOSIS was is and always will be an expression of the GREEK expansionist nationalism on which the modern Greek nation was ideologically founded and has led to Greece today being the single most expansionist nation in the history of modern nations. The desire for ENOSIS amongst Greek Cypriot in Cyprus (and it is not clear how genuine such a desire was in the Greek Cypriot people in the 50's - given the climate of fear and intimidation and violence that EOKA had bought to the island) is the result of 100+ years of brainwashing by Greek run and controlled education in Cyprus and the Greek orthodox church. It is in the name and pursuit of this nonsense that Cyprus was destroyed - as the chief architect of this disaster came to admit himself.

ENOSIS was ideological nonsense as an expression of independence and self determination of CYPRIOTS. It was in practical terms madness (wanting to unify with a country itself in turmoil and with a lower standard of living, a worse political and physical infrastructure and more besides). It was also unachievable in the realities of the world - which surprise surprise contain more than just Greeks and Greek Cypriot. Those are the realities of ENOSIS then and now as far as I am concerned.
Back to top
erolz

Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 11 Aug 2005
Posts: 4195
Location: Kyrenia / Girne

PostPosted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 8:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cyprus rules! wrote:
Hey, as far as I can tell, EOKA were fighting for the self determination rights of the Greek Cypriots (Cypriots), which at that time was for Enosis, or union with Greece.


There in is the problem. They were fighting for the desires of their community only and insisting (and still insist) this was an expression of the will of Cypriots as a whole - and it was not. It was an expression of the desire of only one of the communities for whom Cyprus is their homeland. The right of self determination is NOT a right for one ethnic community to impose it's will on another - that is the antithesis of what self determination means.

Cyprus rules! wrote:

I can understand why people wanted Enosis, and I don't think it was for sinister reasons....


The desire for ENOSIS (and it is not clear how much genuine desire there was amongst ordinary Greek Cypriot for ENOSIS) was not sinister. It was stupid. As a means of ending British rule by the 50's it was clear that ENOSIS was a hindrance to the ending of British rule and to Cypriots gaining independence not a valid feasible means of achieving it
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
All times are GMT + 3 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Page 1 of 7

 


get the latest forum posts directly to your desktop get the latest album posts directly to your desktop

get the latest forum posts directly to your desktop in RSS 2.0 format get the latest album posts directly to your desktop in Atom format

Link Partners

Board Security

3140 Attacks blocked
Talkcyprus.org - the Cyprus bicommunal discussion and chat forum is Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group