 |
| Should we apologise for past demenours???? |
| Yes as it is the way forward. |
|
66% |
[ 14 ] |
| No i don't think so. |
|
9% |
[ 2 ] |
| They got what they deserved and its better this way. |
|
14% |
[ 3 ] |
| I don't care |
|
9% |
[ 2 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 21 |
|
| Author |
Message |
stavrizatz
Mukhtar/is

Joined: 20 Feb 2006 Posts: 952 Location: Australia / Lefkosia
|
|
So self-determination in the 1950 represented the voice of Greek-Cypriots alone and this was not fair (let's asume that no Turkish Cypriots supported self-determination). Is this what your trying to say?
What was fair then? you tell me Erolz.
What is fair, if self-determination is not? |
|
| Back to top |
|
De_La_Soul Warnings : 3 Deputy

Joined: 01 Dec 2005 Posts: 1131
|
|
Dont listen to Erolz, he is totally twisted.
If it was up to him, the Greek revoloution from Turkish Ottoman occupation would be classed as illegal. |
|
| Back to top |
|
erolz
Site Admin

Joined: 11 Aug 2005 Posts: 4211 Location: Kyrenia / Girne
|
|
| stavrizatz wrote: |
| So self-determination in the 1950 represented the voice of Greek-Cypriots alone and this was not fair (let's asume that no Turkish Cypriots supported self-determination). Is this what your trying to say? |
I am saying that enosis was not a valid or legitimate desire of the Cypriot people as a whole. It was the desire of one community alone in Cyprus who in the name of 'self determination' sought to force and impose it on the other community against their collective will. That is not 'self determination' it is the antithesis of it. It is the denial of self determination by on community against the other.
| stavrizatz wrote: |
What was fair then? you tell me Erolz.
What is fair, if self-determination is not? |
Self determination is fair , what is not fair is for the Greek Cypriot community pursuing purely Greek Cypriot objectives to impose enosis on the Turkish Cypriot community against their will.
It would seem you could not be bothered to read the link I went to the trouble of providing you with. So to make it even easier for you here are some relevant excerpts that answer your question
| Quote: |
| I maintain that there were two different groups in Cyprus with diameticaly opposed desires for their futures and the futures of their homeland. I maintin that in such a senario the right, just and most compatible appracoh with the sprit and intent of the rights of self determination, is some form of mutal compromise that accepts that one groups self determination can not be obtain at the expense of the others. The other approach that you subscribe to is that Greek Cypriot had a right to express alone the rights of self determiation of ALL cypriots and with no regard for the Turkish Cypriot community. |
and from the links to the legal expert about self determination.
http://www.eleves.ens.fr/home/blondeel/law.html
| Quote: |
| The right of self-determination is a right which reflects the importance given to communities, collectives and families in many societies14 and the general inherent communal quality of humans. The purpose of the protection of this right is to enable these communities as communities to prosper and transmit their culture as well as to participate fully in the political, economic and social process, this allowing the distinct character of a community ``to have this character reflected in the institutions of government under which it lives''.15 It also forms part of the empowering process of human rights. Thus the right protects people from being subject to oppression by subjugation, domination or exploitation because, as the African Charter makes clear, ``nothing shall justify the domination of a people by another".16 |
| Quote: |
| Importantly, it can be seen in this Resolution that the right of self-determination does not imply that independence, or secession from an independent State, is the only, or even the necessary and appropriate, means of exercising the right. Nevertheless, the right does require that all people within a territory must be consulted before any change in sovereignty over that territory can occur, particularly if it is a colonial territory. |
| Quote: |
| The potential for the wide application of internal self-determination was stated in the Declaration on Principles of International Law, as it is provided that only ``a government representing the whole people belonging to the territory without distinction as to race, creed or colour'' can be considered to be complying with the right of self-determination |
| Quote: |
| Both current State practice and the nature of the right of self-determination place limits on its exercise to protect the rights of others as far as possible. This is because the rights of both individuals and groups need to be protected against oppressive acts in the name of self-determination . |
For you self determination means the right of the Greek Cypriot community to impose anything it likes on the Turkish Cypriot community (including enosis). This is just a gross perversion of what self determination _really_ means. No community has a right to impose it's will on another totally against theirs and with no regard for their wishes what so ever - certainly not the right to 'self determination'. |
|
| Back to top |
|
erolz
Site Admin

Joined: 11 Aug 2005 Posts: 4211 Location: Kyrenia / Girne
|
|
| De_La_Soul wrote: |
| Dont listen to Erolz, he is totally twisted. |
Is that personal insult DLS? |
|
| Back to top |
|
De_La_Soul Warnings : 3 Deputy

Joined: 01 Dec 2005 Posts: 1131
|
|
| Quote: |
| Is that personal insult DLS? |
Why? Have you got your finger on the warning button??? |
|
| Back to top |
|
repulsewarrior
Deputy

Joined: 06 Jan 2006 Posts: 1973 Location: Canada
|
|
DLS, I think that Erolz has a point. There are two communities and by the fact that the great majority of the great majority had for themselves an idea, did not substatiate ignoring the needs of their counterparts. Because Grecophones concentrated on satisfying their own needs, Turcophomes were placed, as a people at peril.
Witness, the Communal Chamber, which remains empty, because Grecophones chose to select no members.
As a State we have matured greatly. Divided as we are, our economy, and our abilities of social-exchange remain of the best, in the world. We are a country, and our recognition, as such, by the UN, and the EU, gives us a singular voice toward the efforts we commit to, as a member of these International communities. |
|
| Back to top |
|
De_La_Soul Warnings : 3 Deputy

Joined: 01 Dec 2005 Posts: 1131
|
|
...and what say did the 'Grecophones' have when they were under a 300 odd year oppression from the 'Turcophones'? Or when the 'Turcophones' sided with our new masters the British.
Was it so wrong for us to have our own say on our own destiny, especially after so many years of oppression and poverty???
At the end of the day, Cyprus was under occupation and in poverty, why the hell couldnt we have our own say? In a time of desperation, did you expect the Greek Cypriots to lose out on their democratic right for the sake of the decendents of our Ottoman oppressors. What did they do for US!? |
|
| Back to top |
|
cannedmoose Warnings : 4 Moderator

Joined: 12 Aug 2005 Posts: 5357 Location: National Forest, England
|
|
| De_La_Soul wrote: |
| Quote: |
| Is that personal insult DLS? |
Why? Have you got your finger on the warning button??? |
No, but I have  |
|
| Back to top |
|
De_La_Soul Warnings : 3 Deputy

Joined: 01 Dec 2005 Posts: 1131
|
|
| ooooh, ive got the squits now. |
|
| Back to top |
|
zan Warnings : 2 Mukhtar/is

Joined: 31 Dec 2005 Posts: 962
|
|
Hold on! Hold on!Is my brain working slow or what. I s our friend DLS the one and only Main source of old. DJ, bad attitude and record collector????  |
|
| Back to top |
|
De_La_Soul Warnings : 3 Deputy

Joined: 01 Dec 2005 Posts: 1131
|
|
| DJ, MILITANT and record collector. |
|
| Back to top |
|
stavrizatz
Mukhtar/is

Joined: 20 Feb 2006 Posts: 952 Location: Australia / Lefkosia
|
|
Thanks Erolz for the link, great, wholistic view of self-detrmination and its limitations. Last time the link didn't work.
From what I understand you believe that self-determination was not really self-determination because it results Enosis and Enosis discriminated the ethnic minority of Turkish-Cypriots. In my opinion it didn't as the extreme majority of the whole population supported Enosis including a number of Turkish Cypriots. Family friends of my father from the mixed village Ayios Vasileios supported Enosis and for this reason I guess Enosis represented self-determination.
I believe the whole debate is a clash of opinions. You have made you point of view very clear and I respect it. I guess you have way more knowledge on the subject that me, I am only 21 and my knowledge is somehow limited. I formed the above opinion, I do not exclude the possibility of being wrong!
Cheers |
|
| Back to top |
|
stavrizatz
Mukhtar/is

Joined: 20 Feb 2006 Posts: 952 Location: Australia / Lefkosia
|
|
DLS
maybe Erolz is twisted, but in that regard I am twisted as well on the subject of self-determination and Enosis.
I beleive Enosis was and is still fair as a result of Cypriot self determination, not Greek, not Turkish, not Uzbegistanish!!!
ps don't forget the topic is Apology and RESPECT |
|
| Back to top |
|
Viewpoint Warnings : 2 Mukhtar/is

Joined: 14 Aug 2005 Posts: 971 Location: Lefkosa/Nicosia
|
|
stavrizatz as a young generation Greek Cypriot how can you still continue to blindly support the idea of enosis as being correct? look at what it has done to Cyprus, we are moving more and more towards permanent partition every day and you come out with following
| Quote: |
I believe Enosis was and is still fair as a result of Cypriot self determination, not Greek, not Turkish, not Uzbegistanish!!!
|
Its obvious that faced with dire circumstances such as being wiped out visa vie enosis minorities can and will rise to do all they can to stop such actions of the majority. The Cypriot issue is a prime example of this and until a time where we feel the threat has been removed and both side desire a solution they will compromise to either reunite or part ways forever. |
|
| Back to top |
|
stavrizatz
Mukhtar/is

Joined: 20 Feb 2006 Posts: 952 Location: Australia / Lefkosia
|
|
How can you accuse me that I blindly support Enosis. Do you know what self-determination is? If not read the link of Erolz.
Actually I do not blindly support Enosis but you blindly oppose it, maybe without examining the possitives and neggatives of it. And that is exactly what pisses me off, not that people have an extreme opinion of some kind, but people who blindly oppose and disrespect an opinion of someone else. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|  |
Link Partners

2.033002036E+23 Attacks blocked
Talkcyprus.org - the Cyprus bicommunal discussion and chat forum is Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|