RegisterRegister   Log inLog in   AlbumAlbum   Home Portal PageHome  

Are Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus and KRNI put in the same basket?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Author Message
Alexandros Lordos

Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 19 Aug 2005
Posts: 324
Location: Cyprus/Greece

PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 9:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Viewpoint wrote:
Statistical information on how many Greek Cypriots would accept compensation or want to return to the north would be very interesting as we could then Gage the size of compensation (the shortfall) and population distribution.


I guess this one is for me ... Smile

"What would you do with your property in the north if it was returned to you?"

- Use it as my permanent residence: 30%

- Use it as a holiday home: 40%

- Rent it for income: 15%

- Sell it: 15%


(Sample of 1,000 Greek Cypriots, surveyed in May 2005)
Back to top
Viewpoint
Warnings : 2

Mukhtar/is
Mukhtar/is


Joined: 14 Aug 2005
Posts: 971
Location: Lefkosa/Nicosia

PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 10:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

So if we assume that there were 180.000 refugees (I'm not sure of official figure, so many figures have been quoted from 100 to 250 thousand)

With the return of land we potentially would have 90.000 refugees going back.(40/50.000 in Maras/Varosha)

Taking Alex's survey into consideration we can conclude the following;

27.000 would want to move and live in the north.
49.500 would keep their property but not look for residency in the north.
13.500 would sell up.

The above figures will of course be effected by other factors such as the issue of which properties may actually be physically returned so the sell up total will increase.

My initial thoughts are that the property ownership % is still very high in favor of Greek Cypriots, does anyone know if there are limits imposed in other countries with a federal structure?, but the residency seekers would not effect the overall balance and could be addressed if it reached levels that would cause a political imbalance in favor of Greek Cypriots.

But it gives us an idea of the volumes which imo are not that daunting.

These figures should be made more public and brought to the attention of both communities to help them understand what it actually entails when they talk about right of return and how many Greek Cypriots will actually live in the north.

Why aren't we educating our people on these issues? surely it will help them make a healthier decision when the time comes.

Any comments?
Back to top
Birkibrisli

Deputy
Deputy


Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 1466
Location: Australia

PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 12:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think there is another way of describing this issue to avoid the confusion between right of movement and right of property: Right of return...

This is the crucial point without which there can be NO just and lasting solution.If everyone who wants to return can be accommodated,that will go a long way to heal the wounds of the past.Surely 27,000 people can be given the right of return without having the Turkish Cypriots shaking in their boots about losing political power,which we do not have at this very moment I might add.If we have a true federation with every Cypriot obliged to learn both Greek and Turkish,that will go along way to promote peace and harmony between the communities.An artificial BBF will not work in Cyprus.It will only fester bitterness and illwill and lead to more troubles down the line.If we must have a BBF lets make it as free and democratic as possible,to give everyone a good chance to develop as Cypriots and leave behind their ethnic origins (I am not saying forget,I say give less importance to!).I think Cypriots are capable and mature enough to achieve this,and the past troubles can be a positive light in achieving one nation/multiethnic status.
Back to top
erolz

Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 11 Aug 2005
Posts: 4211
Location: Kyrenia / Girne

PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 12:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Birkibrisli wrote:

This is the crucial point without which there can be NO just and lasting solution.If everyone who wants to return can be accommodated,that will go a long way to heal the wounds of the past.Surely 27,000 people can be given the right of return without having the Turkish Cypriots shaking in their boots about losing political power,which we do not have at this very moment I might add.


And under tha Annan plan 27,000 Greek Cypriot would have been able to live in the northern component state and have full residency there and thus vote at the component state state level and local levels in the northern component state. This is in addition to the those Greek Cypriot that would have got to return to what is now the North, and live in and be residident in the southern component state, with the boundry changes.

Birkibrisli wrote:

If we have a true federation with every Cypriot obliged to learn both Greek and Turkish,that will go along way to promote peace and harmony between the communities.An artificial BBF will not work in Cyprus.It will only fester bitterness and illwill and lead to more troubles down the line.If we must have a BBF lets make it as free and democratic as possible,to give everyone a good chance to develop as Cypriots and leave behind their ethnic origins (I am not saying forget,I say give less importance to!).I think Cypriots are capable and mature enough to achieve this,and the past troubles can be a positive light in achieving one nation/multiethnic status.


Again this was no problem under the Annan plan (as I understand it) if bilinguality was universal then no limits exits on the number of southern component state citizens (Greek Cypriot) that can live in the North and have residency.

So why I wonder are the Annan plan provisions on such matters viewd by Greek Cypriot and described by Greek Cypriot as a groos violation of their rights and unacceptable to them?
Back to top
Kifeas
Warnings : 6

Ministerial
Ministerial


Joined: 26 Aug 2005
Posts: 2733
Location: Location: Pafos-Cyprus, since 1974 ethnic cleansing. Originally, Lapithos, northern occupied Cyprus.

PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 1:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Viewpoint wrote:

Direct Flights.
Lifting of restrictions on Turkish Cypriot joining certain organizations related to trade, finance and social activities.(these can be achieved jointly)
Direct financial aid, not via Greek Cypriots.
Relaxation on direct trade with EU
More proactive and positive approach of Greek Cypriot leadership towards Turkish Cypriot community and unification.
are just a few that spring to mind.


I assume with direct flights and direct trade you imply that the airports and ports in the north should be opened for the Turkish Cypriots to do all these.

If so, may I ask which authority, other than the illegal and non-recognized "Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus", will undertake the control of these airports and harbors?

Unless of course what you have in mind was for the "Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus" to play such a role, in which case I must assume that you were simply joking when asking the Greek Cypriots to concede to such an act in the name of lifting "isolation," something which will essentially equate to an acknowledgement and de facto recognition of "Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus" by the Greek Cypriots themselves.

Is this what you are asking from the Greek Cypriots to do, or you were merely joking?
Back to top
Viewpoint
Warnings : 2

Mukhtar/is
Mukhtar/is


Joined: 14 Aug 2005
Posts: 971
Location: Lefkosa/Nicosia

PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 1:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kifeas wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:

Direct Flights.
Lifting of restrictions on Turkish Cypriot joining certain organizations related to trade, finance and social activities.(these can be achieved jointly)
Direct financial aid, not via Greek Cypriots.
Relaxation on direct trade with EU
More proactive and positive approach of Greek Cypriot leadership towards Turkish Cypriot community and unification.
are just a few that spring to mind.


I assume with direct flights and direct trade you imply that the airports and ports in the north should be opened for the Turkish Cypriots to do all these.

If so, may I ask which authority, other than the illegal and non-recognized "Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus", will undertake the control of these airports and harbors?

Unless of course what you have in mind was for the "Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus" to play such a role, in which case I must assume that you were simply joking when asking the Greek Cypriots to concede to such an act in the name of lifting "isolation," something which will essentially equate to an acknowledgement and de facto recognition of "Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus" by the Greek Cypriots themselves.

Is this what you are asking from the Greek Cypriots to do, or you were merely joking?


Have you not enjoyed being the sole representative of "Republic of Cyprus" for last 31 years isnt it time you started to share??? call it what you will interim temporary Turkish Cypriot administration it doesnt really mean a lot when you are genuinely seeking a united Cyprus. But of course if you are not you will find every excuse to object and main the north in economic isolation becasue you wrong imo feel that this will yield better results for your community.
I am willing to share the ports in the north are you willing to do the same with those in the south???
Back to top
cannedmoose
Warnings : 4

Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 12 Aug 2005
Posts: 5358
Location: National Forest, England

PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 2:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

On this issue, can anyone shed any light on the period between 1974 and 1983, i.e. prior to the declaration of the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus. During this period, was there contact between the provisional Turkish Cypriot administration and the outside world? Or did the Republic of Cyprus authorise international closure of the ports immediately after 1974?
Back to top
Kifeas
Warnings : 6

Ministerial
Ministerial


Joined: 26 Aug 2005
Posts: 2733
Location: Location: Pafos-Cyprus, since 1974 ethnic cleansing. Originally, Lapithos, northern occupied Cyprus.

PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 5:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

cannedmoose wrote:
On this issue, can anyone shed any light on the period between 1974 and 1983, i.e. prior to the declaration of the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus. During this period, was there contact between the provisional Turkish Cypriot administration and the outside world? Or did the Republic of Cyprus authorise international closure of the ports immediately after 1974?


Moose, what is the point of your question?

Any international port and /or airport to open for international use, it has to be authorized, controlled, operated and supervised by the legal authority and /or government under whose territory they are situated.

According to the Turkish Cypriots, "Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus" is the legal authority and it is the one that must authorize, control and supervise the operation of those ports and airports in the north,

According to the Republic of Cyprus, the EU, the UN and the rest of the international community but Turkey, the Republic of Cyprus is the legal authority under whose territory those facilities are situated.

For the Republic of Cyprus to concede to what the Turkish Cypriots are asking, it has to essentially recognize that the north occupied territory is not part of it's territory and that it has no legal authority, but only the "Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus" does. That by itself equates to a de facto recognition of the "Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus" by the Republic of Cyprus itself. It is as simple as that!

If there was a way for the ports and airports in the north to open under the authority and control of the Republic of Cyprus, then I am sure a solution to this particular problem would have been found. However, this is impossible. Do you have any idea how this can happen?

As an alternative, the Republic of Cyprus said to the Turkish Cypriots, now that they can move to the south freely and are not prohibited by the Turkish army, to come and freely contact all their imports /exports and flights from the ports and airports of the south. the Turkish Cypriots do not want to do that but only through the ports and airports in the north.

The Greek Cypriot side proposed them to concede to the opening of the Famagusta harbor under the control of the two municipalities of Famagusta, after they allow the opening and return of the closed city of Varoshia. (Note that the two municipalities are legitimate institutions under the Republic of Cyprus constitution.) The Turkish Cypriots do not want to do that either.

It is obvious that what they are after is not the lifting of "isolation" but to gain politically by getting the Greek Cypriots to acknowledge the status of "Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus" as a legal authority. This cannot happen, because it will equate with a complete capitulation and loss of the Greek Cypriot case. We will need no more negotiations, no more a solution, no more the UN and their plans. Everything will be over and in absolute and complete victory of Turkey and the Turkish Cypriot side. The game will be over, once and for ever!
Back to top
bg_turk

Deputy
Deputy


Joined: 08 Oct 2005
Posts: 1317
Location: Bulgaria

PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 5:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kifeas wrote:

Moose, what is the point of your question?

Any international port and /or airport to open for international use, it has to be authorized, controlled, operated and supervised by the legal authority and /or government under whose territory they are situated.

According to the Turkish Cypriots, "Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus" is the legal authority and it is the one that must authorize, control and supervise the operation of those ports and airports in the north,

According to the Republic of Cyprus, the EU, the UN and the rest of the international community but Turkey, the Republic of Cyprus is the legal authority under whose territory those facilities are situated.

For the Republic of Cyprus to concede to what the Turkish Cypriots are asking, it has to essentially recognize that the north occupied territory is not part of it's territory and that it has no legal authority, but only the "Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus" does. That by itself equates to a de facto recognition of the "Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus" by the Republic of Cyprus itself. It is as simple as that!


No doubt you are aware of the Taiwan model, where the government is not recognized but that does not prevent the rest of the world from trading with that entity.
Also you are aware with the situation of Kosovo where the authorities can trade with the rest of the world although they are from an unrecognized entity.
Additionally, the de facto independent provisional kurdish administration in the north of Iraq can trade to some extent freely with the rest of the world, it does have its own airport, though quite primitve, and nobody is questioning its ability to administer its ports of entry and exit.

There are many precedents, so there are no legal obstacles for the operation of flights and direct trade to the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus. The obstacles are mainly political and stem from the Greek Cypriot necessity for economic deprivation of Turkish Cypriots for fear of economic competition. One of the major lobbies for the rejection of the Annan Plan were the hotelliers and interest groups which had major investments in tourism in the south, right?

Why does the Republic of Cyprus prevent the operation of these ports? Is it because it is truely concerned about recognition, or becuase it is concerned about Turkish Cypriots gaining economic power that would make it much harder to assimilate them in a future unified state?
Back to top
Viewpoint
Warnings : 2

Mukhtar/is
Mukhtar/is


Joined: 14 Aug 2005
Posts: 971
Location: Lefkosa/Nicosia

PostPosted: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

bg_turk wrote:
Kifeas wrote:

Moose, what is the point of your question?

Any international port and /or airport to open for international use, it has to be authorized, controlled, operated and supervised by the legal authority and /or government under whose territory they are situated.

According to the Turkish Cypriots, "Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus" is the legal authority and it is the one that must authorize, control and supervise the operation of those ports and airports in the north,

According to the Republic of Cyprus, the EU, the UN and the rest of the international community but Turkey, the Republic of Cyprus is the legal authority under whose territory those facilities are situated.

For the Republic of Cyprus to concede to what the Turkish Cypriots are asking, it has to essentially recognize that the north occupied territory is not part of it's territory and that it has no legal authority, but only the "Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus" does. That by itself equates to a de facto recognition of the "Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus" by the Republic of Cyprus itself. It is as simple as that!


No doubt you are aware of the Taiwan model, where the government is not recognized but that does not prevent the rest of the world from trading with that entity.
Also you are aware with the situation of Kosovo where the authorities can trade with the rest of the world although they are from an unrecognized entity.
Additionally, the de facto independent provisional kurdish administration in the north of Iraq can trade to some extent freely with the rest of the world, it does have its own airport, though quite primitve, and nobody is questioning its ability to administer its ports of entry and exit.

There are many precedents, so there are no legal obstacles for the operation of flights and direct trade to the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus. The obstacles are mainly political and stem from the Greek Cypriot necessity for economic deprivation of Turkish Cypriots for fear of economic competition. One of the major lobbies for the rejection of the Annan Plan were the hotelliers and interest groups which had major investments in tourism in the south, right?

Why does the Republic of Cyprus prevent the operation of these ports? Is it because it is truely concerned about recognition, or becuase it is concerned about Turkish Cypriots gaining economic power that would make it much harder to assimilate them in a future unified state?


bg_turk its called holding someone economically hostage, thats the name of the game, if we are not allowed to develop economically then the Greek Cypriot mentality is that we will want a united Cyprus, imo this is paranoia and they hold onto is totally wrong, Talat offered maras for direct trade but Greek Cypriots rejected this idea. If we are trying to move forward and the north is no longer seeking recognition of the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus but a comprehensive solution then surely this is just one step in the right direction.
Back to top
Kifeas
Warnings : 6

Ministerial
Ministerial


Joined: 26 Aug 2005
Posts: 2733
Location: Location: Pafos-Cyprus, since 1974 ethnic cleansing. Originally, Lapithos, northern occupied Cyprus.

PostPosted: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

bg_turk wrote:

No doubt you are aware of the Taiwan model, where the government is not recognized but that does not prevent the rest of the world from trading with that entity.
Also you are aware with the situation of Kosovo where the authorities can trade with the rest of the world although they are from an unrecognized entity.
Additionally, the de facto independent provisional kurdish administration in the north of Iraq can trade to some extent freely with the rest of the world, it does have its own airport, though quite primitve, and nobody is questioning its ability to administer its ports of entry and exit.

There are many precedents, so there are no legal obstacles for the operation of flights and direct trade to the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus. The obstacles are mainly political and stem from the Greek Cypriot necessity for economic deprivation of Turkish Cypriots for fear of economic competition. One of the major lobbies for the rejection of the Annan Plan were the hotelliers and interest groups which had major investments in tourism in the south, right?

Why does the Republic of Cyprus prevent the operation of these ports? Is it because it is truely concerned about recognition, or becuase it is concerned about Turkish Cypriots gaining economic power that would make it much harder to assimilate them in a future unified state?


This is an answer to bg_Turk for his above posting and to Viewpoint.

Quote:
[04] Ali Erel said that the Turkish Cypriot side insists on the two EU regulations being implemented together
Turkish Cypriot daily KIBRIS newspaper (27/10/05), under the title, The separation of the regulations is unavoidable, reported that the Chairman of the Turkish Cypriot Chamber of Commerce, Mr Ali Erel, told the paper exclusively that the Turkish Cypriot side insists on the implementation of the Direct Trade regulation in order to gain political benefits for the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (occupied territories of the Republic of Cyprus), although EU member-states are against this tactic.
Mr Erel said that the Financial Aid and Direct Trade regulations, which were proposed by the European Commission to ease the isolation of the Turkish Cypriot community, must be decoupled and that Turkish Cypriots should immediately accept the Financial Aid regulation and use it without loosing any more time.

Mr Erel added that funds from the Financial Aid regulation can be used in many ways to benefit the Turkish Cypriots.


http://www.hri.org/news/cyprus/tcpr/2005/05-10-27.tcpr.html#04
Back to top
Viewpoint
Warnings : 2

Mukhtar/is
Mukhtar/is


Joined: 14 Aug 2005
Posts: 971
Location: Lefkosa/Nicosia

PostPosted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 12:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kifeas did you hear Ali Erel will not be re-elected his term has now ended?
Back to top
Birkibrisli

Deputy
Deputy


Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 1466
Location: Australia

PostPosted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 3:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Viewpoint wrote:
Kifeas did you hear Ali Erel will not be re-elected his term has now ended?


Correction: There are moves within CTP to stop Ali Erel from being elected again.Ali Erel is fighting these moves which he considers political payback for speaking his mind freely.
Back to top
Viewpoint
Warnings : 2

Mukhtar/is
Mukhtar/is


Joined: 14 Aug 2005
Posts: 971
Location: Lefkosa/Nicosia

PostPosted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 9:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Birkibrisli wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:
Kifeas did you hear Ali Erel will not be re-elected his term has now ended?


Correction: There are moves within CTP to stop Ali Erel from being elected again.Ali Erel is fighting these moves which he considers political payback for speaking his mind freely.


Birkibrisli the results the same. You should really come back and live on the island then you will see that your point of view will gradually change. Davulun sesi uzaktan hos gelir (the sound of the drum from a distance sounds melodic).
Back to top
Kifeas
Warnings : 6

Ministerial
Ministerial


Joined: 26 Aug 2005
Posts: 2733
Location: Location: Pafos-Cyprus, since 1974 ethnic cleansing. Originally, Lapithos, northern occupied Cyprus.

PostPosted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 9:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Viewpoint wrote:
Birkibrisli wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:
Kifeas did you hear Ali Erel will not be re-elected his term has now ended?


Correction: There are moves within CTP to stop Ali Erel from being elected again.Ali Erel is fighting these moves which he considers political payback for speaking his mind freely.


Birkibrisli the results the same. You should really come back and live on the island then you will see that your point of view will gradually change. Davulun sesi uzaktan hos gelir (the sound of the drum from a distance sounds melodic).


Viewpoint, forget the sound of the drums and whether Ali Erel will be re-elected or not and tell us, is he lying when he said that the real aim behind the insistence to associated the EU aid with the issue of direct trade is done merely for political gains on the issue of "Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus" recognition, or not? Ali Erel is not a mere parachutist that happened to become the chairman of the Turkish Cypriot chamber of commerce for one term and that’s all his achievement. Ali Erel is one of the master minds behind all those massive demonstrations of the Turkish Cypriots 2 and 3 years ago and a highly educated and intelligent person. Is he now a traitor for saying what he said, or is he a spy of the Greek Cypriots?
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
All times are GMT + 3 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 2 of 4

 


get the latest forum posts directly to your desktop get the latest album posts directly to your desktop

get the latest forum posts directly to your desktop in RSS 2.0 format get the latest album posts directly to your desktop in Atom format

Link Partners

Board Security

605118 Attacks blocked
Talkcyprus.org - the Cyprus bicommunal discussion and chat forum is Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group